------------------------------------------------------------------------ Source HSU and Fault surfaces Fault surfaces and HSU definitions from Earthvision Model sent by Tim Vogt Supporting Navarro-Intera, LLC contracted to the U.S. Department of Energy, NNSA Nevada Field Office 702-295-2057 office 702-994-2489 cell Tim.vogt@nv.doe.gov March 05, 2014 2:25 PM Download location https://ugta.nv.doe.gov/sites/EarthVision/VisualizationLibrary/20140305_for_LANL.tar Local: Interpolation from .seq file /scratch/nts/ev_models/HFM_PM_20140305/ Final fault surfaces are created and written in /scratch/nts/ev_models/HFM_PM_20140305/fault View files for analysis and images added to /scratch/nts/ev_models/HFM_PM_20140305/faces Support and analysis of area fault and geology: From: Drellack, Sigmund Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 2:04 PM To: Miller, Terry A; Vogt, Tim (CONTR) Cc: Harp, Dylan R Subject: RE: ETCSZ fault with respect to geology Terry, The ETCSZ is one of several caldera structural margins to the Silent Canyon caldera complex (SCCC). The SCCC is comprised of an older Grouse Canyon caldera and the younger Area 20 caldera. The W-E ETCSZ is the southern boundary for the Grouse Canyon Inner Collapse (collapse down on the north side) and the northern boundary for the Area 20 outer Collapse (down on the south side). As such we conceptualized this structure as being vertical. But, the model does not allow truly vertical structures, so in the HFM it is not perfectly vertical. The top of the ETCSZ should be the top of the Inlet Aquifer (IA) HSU on the south, and the top of the Crater Flat confining unit (CFCU) on the north. The top of the ETCSZ can also be defined as the base of the Calico Hills HSU(s) which overlies the IA and the CFCU. I hope this helps. Let me know if you have more questions. Sig Drellack National Security Technologies, LLC Contractor to the United States Department of Energy Mail Address Mail Stop NLV 082 P.O. Box 98521 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8521 Phone: 702-295-0170 FAX: 702-295-1313 E-mail: drellasl@nv.doe.gov ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Source grids These grids Start with uniform grids created for 2012 modeling by Dylan Harp. These grids are created with uniform spacing and are stretched vertically to fit the watertable surface. Each grid spacing is halved to create a set of coarse to fine grid resolutions. /scratch/er/dharp/projects/ugta/ascem/PahuteMesa/site_runs/mesh/uniform -rw-r--r-- 1 gable pf 1052832 Oct 31 2012 min_max_dxyz_026_fit_wt_flts_nocon/mesh.exo -rw-r--r-- 1 gable pf 8190300 Oct 31 2012 min_max_dxyz_051_fit_wt_flts_nocon/mesh.exo -rw-r--r-- 1 gable pf 64733900 Oct 31 2012 min_max_dxyz_101_fit_wt_flts_nocon/mesh.exo -rw-r--r-- 1 gable pf 514901432 Oct 31 2012 min_max_dxyz_201_fit_wt_flts_nocon/mesh.exo -rw-r--r-- 1 gable pf 4107555832 Nov 2 2012 min_max_dxyz_401_fit_wt_flts_nocon/mesh.exo Grids were created by Carl Gable in: /scratch/nts/gable/grid_gen/ascem/pahute_mesa/mesh/uniform -rw-r--r-- 1 gable pf 1052832 Oct 31 2012 min_max_dxyz_026_fit_wt_flts_nocon/mesh.exo -rw-r--r-- 1 gable pf 8190300 Oct 31 2012 min_max_dxyz_051_fit_wt_flts_nocon/mesh.exo -rw-r--r-- 1 gable pf 64733900 Oct 31 2012 min_max_dxyz_101_fit_wt_flts_nocon/mesh.exo -rw-r--r-- 1 gable pf 514901432 Oct 31 2012 min_max_dxyz_201_fit_wt_flts_nocon/mesh.exo -rw-r--r-- 1 gable pf 4107555832 Nov 2 2012 min_max_dxyz_401_fit_wt_flts_nocon/mesh.exo Source Watertable surface: The top of the grids align with this watertable surface. /scratch/nts/gable/grid_gen/ascem/pahute_mesa/data/water_table_01 -rw-r-xr-x 1 gable pf 3449276 Sep 25 2012 watertable_quads.gmv Subject:RE: Water table surface for Pahute Mesa U20WW area Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 06:06:08 -0700 From: Ruskauff, Greg (CONTR) To: Kwicklis, Edward M CC: Gable, Carl Walter The attached ArcGIS files are from Joe Fenelon's 2010 mapping of the NTS groundwater systems. The great thickness of the Calico Hills, coupled with the uncertainty in properties ought to make this a close enough approximation. Source HSU and Fault Surfaces for 2012 (overwrite for 2014: These data are overwritten with the PM Phase II HSU's and Faults and have no impact on the 2014 grids. /scratch/nts/gable/grid_gen/ascem/pahute_mesa/data/ver01/CHZCM_Lavas4LANL Files created and exported by Kevin Day 6/19/2012 Kevin.Day@nv.doe.gov Files are exported from chzcm_lavas.100x100x4.z10.unsliced.faces, an Earthvision model representing conceptualized distribution of lava flow aquifers within the Calico Hills Hydrostratigraphic Unit of the Pahute Mesa Phase I Hydrostratigraphic Framework Model. This export was produced within a polygon centered on well U20_WW, constrained on the top and bottom by the Calico Hills HSU and by UTM Zone 11 NAD 27 coordinates: X Y Minimum 548500 4119800 Maximum 554000 4125500 Range 5500 5700 Dimensions 111 115 Grid spacing 50 50 Files: CH.base.dat - base of Calico Hills HSU CH.surface.dat - top of Calico Hills HSU chzcm_lavas.pdat - distribution of 5 lava flow aquifers within CH, only lavas are included, empty space is assumed to be the Calico Hills matrix boxcar_wdcv2.dat / boxcar_wdcv2.tiploop.dat - Boxcar fault surface and tiploop polygon eastgreeley_wdcv2.dat / eastgreeley_wdcv2.tiploop.dat - East Greeley fault surface and tiploop polygon etcsz_wdc.dat / etcsz_wdc.tiploop.dat - East Thirsty Canyon Structural Zone fault surface and tiploop polygon ribcliffwdfull.dat / ribcliffwdfull.tiploop.dat - Ribbon Cliff Structural Zone fault surface and tiploop polygon westgreeley_wdc.dat / westgreeley_wdc.tiploop.dat - West Greeley fault surface and tiploop polygon ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fault Files in this area for the 2014 model: Order from west to east 1 BX - Boxcar (barely touches west side of mesh) 2 BU - Buteo (full NS fault passing near U20) 3 SPMSZ - Southern Pahute Mesa Structural zone (EW cutting through SW corner) 4 WG - West Greeley (full NS, east of Buteo) 5 EG - East Greeley (full NS, east side of mesh) 6 ETCSZ - East Thirsty Canyon (EW dies out west of WG fault) These are nearby but do not intersect the mesh area: 7 RCSZ - Ribbon Cliff (dies out more than 100m west of domain) 8 SCSZW - Silent Canyon West (more than 500m north of domain) Interplated fault blocks for 50x50 grid resolution: 99 "below_WestBoxcar_S" FaultFile "fault/WB.2grd" 104 "below_WestBoxcar" FaultFile "fault/WB.2grd" 109 "above_Buteo_M" FaultFile "fault/BU.2grd" 110 "below_Buteo_M" FaultFile "fault/BU.2grd 111 "above_Buteo_S" FaultFile "fault/BU.2grd 112 "below_Buteo_S FaultFile "fault/BU.2grd" 116 "above_SCSZW_W" FaultFile "fault/SCSZW.2grd" 118 "above_SCSZW_MW" FaultFile "fault/SCSZW.2grd" 133 "above_EastGreeley_M" FaultFile "fault/EG.2grd" 134 "below_EastGreeley_M" FaultFile "fault/EG.2grd" See images in /images directory See names in fault_acronyms.xlsx Fault ETCSZ had problems with top and side truncation and took further work. First a different plan to triangulate was needed, it worked to connect and interpolate with y=0 instead of z=0 as this fault is very nearly vertical. The fault is truncated by WG and bottom of Calico Hills. Fault was refined along these sides to minimize the jagged effect of removing elements. A smooth edge version could be created with some work, but for these grids it is not needed. Tim Vogt sent surface files that represent the base of CH (a combination of the top of IA and the top of CFCU) /scratch/nts/ev_models/HFM_PM_20140305/fault -rw-r--r-- 1 tamiller sft 1089795 Apr 1 13:18 ../CFCU.surf.2grd -rw-r--r-- 1 tamiller sft 1089791 Apr 1 13:19 ../IA.surf.2grd Final fault surfaces are created and written in /scratch/nts/ev_models/HFM_PM_20140305/fault/tiploop_to_surf All fault related images are in /scratch/nts/ev_models/HFM_PM_20140305/fault/images -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From EV PM_20140305 ev_facedump faces/ovpmv25.lfas.faces > ev_facedump.txt Version 8 Closed, Sliced Info Key: CoordinateSystemName Data: NAD27 / UTM Zone 11 North Key: CoordinateSystemId Data: CRD189B1 Key: Unsliced Data: ovpmv25.lfas.unsliced.faces Key: SequenceFile Data: ovpmv25.temp0.seq Key: WFPFile Data: ovpmv25.wfp Key: Title1 Data: Unknown Key: Title2 Data: Unknown Key: Units Data: Unknown Key: FacesFromType Data: 2grd Key: Accuracy Data: 0.080000 Space range: 518933.000000 to 569733.000000, 4084868.000000 to 4138268.000000, -7000.000000 to 2400.000000 x and y units: meters z units: meters proj: Universal Transverse Mercator, zone: 11 ellipsoid: Clarke 1866/NAD27 projection parameters: 1) 6378206.400000 2) 6356583.800000 3) 0.000000 4) 0.000000 5) 0.000000 6) 0.000000 7) 0.000000 8) 0.000000 9) 0.000000 10) 0.000000 11) 0.000000 12) 0.000000 13) 0.000000 14) 0.000000 15) 0.000000 Total Space Volume: 25499568000000.000000 Fault Block Names: [1] above_ATCSM_E [2] below_ATCSM_E [3] above_M29_N [4] below_M29_N [5] below_M23_N [6] below_M4 [7] below_M5S [8] above_RD5 [9] above_M1_S [10] below_M1_S [11] below_M2_S [12] above_RD2 [13] below_RD2 [14] above_RD4 [15] above_M19 [16] above_Paintbrush_N [17] below_Paintbrush_N [18] above_M9 [19] below_M9 [20] above_RD9 [21] above_M6 [22] above_WestGreeley_S [23] below_WestGreeley_S [24] below_M7 [25] above_M33_S [26] above_M26_M [27] above_M27_N [28] above_M28_N [29] below_M28_N [30] above_M33_N [31] above_M26_N [32] below_M26_N [33] below_M32 [34] above_M26_S [35] above_M27_M [36] above_M28_M [37] below_M28_M [38] above_M27_S [39] above_M28_S [40] below_M28_S [41] above_M2_MS [42] below_M2_MS [43] above_M1_N [44] above_M6_N [45] below_M6_N [46] below_WestGreeley_SM [47] below_EastGreeley_S [48] below_M9_N [49] above_M31 [50] below_M31 [51] below_M30 [52] below_M29_S [53] below_M23 [54] below_M24 [55] above_BMCSM [56] above_Paintbrush_M [57] below_Paintbrush_M [58] above_WindyWash [59] below_WindyWash [60] above_SM30 [61] above_PahCanyon [62] above_SM6 [63] above_SM10 [64] above_SM20 [65] below_SM20 [66] above_FleurdeLis [67] above_Detachment_E [68] below_Detachment_E [69] above_BeattyWash_N [70] below_BeattyWash_N [71] below_Detachment_M [72] above_BeattyWash_S [73] below_BeattyWash_S [74] below_Detachment_W [75] above_M5N [76] above_20_7_MN [77] below_20_7_MN [78] below_20_8_M [79] below_M2_M [80] above_M3_N [81] above_M2 [82] below_M2 [83] above_20_8_S [84] below_20_8_S [85] above_RRVSM_S [86] above_WestGreeley_MS [87] below_WestGreeley_MS [88] below_EastGreeley_MS [89] below_ScrughamPeak_M [90] above_SM20_N [91] below_SM20_N [92] above_Detachment_N [93] below_Detachment_N [94] above_Handley [95] above_20_7_N [96] below_20_7_N [97] below_20_8_N [98] below_M2_N [99] below_WestBoxcar_S [100] below_SWA20CSM_N [101] above_SWA20CSM [102] below_SWA20CSM [103] above_WestBoxcar [104] below_WestBoxcar [105] below_WSCSZ_M [106] below_GCCSMNW [107] above_WSCSZ [108] below_WSCSZ [109] above_Buteo_M [110] below_Buteo_M [111] above_Buteo_S [112] below_Buteo_S [113] above_Buteo_N [114] below_Buteo_N [115] below_GCCSMNW_E [116] above_SCSZW_W [117] below_SCSZW_W [118] above_SCSZW_MW [119] below_SCSZW_MW [120] above_EastEstuary_S [121] below_EastEstuary_S [122] above_EastEstuary [123] below_EastEstuary [124] above_SCSZW [125] below_SCSZW [126] above_WestEstuary_N [127] below_WestEstuary_N [128] below_EastEstuary_N [129] above_ScrughamPeak_N [130] below_ScrughamPeak_N [131] above_Rickey [132] below_Rickey [133] above_EastGreeley_M [134] below_EastGreeley_M [135] above_ScrughamPeak_MN [136] below_ScrughamPeak_MN [137] above_EastGreeley [138] above_ScrughamPeak [139] below_ScrughamPeak [140] above_RRVSM [141] below_RRVSM [142] above_RM4 [143] below_RM4 [144] below_RM3 [145] above_RM4_N [146] below_RM4_N Zone Names: [1] ATICU [2] RMICU [3] CCICU [4] CHICU [5] BMICU [6] MGCU [7] RVICU [8] SCICU [9] LCCU [10] LCA [11] UCCU [12] LCA3 [13] LCCU1 [14] SCVCU [15] PBRCM [16] BRA [17] BFCU [18] LVTA2 [19] SWA [20] KA [21] CFCU [22] CFCM [23] IA [24] CHLFA5 [25] CHLFA4 [26] CHLFA3 [27] CHLFA2 [28] CHLFA1 [29] CHZCM [30] CHVTA [31] YMCFCM [32] TSA [33] PLFA [34] LPCU [35] PVTA [36] TCA [37] MPCU [38] SPA [39] UPCU [40] BA [41] PBPCU [42] CPA [43] PCM [44] WWA [45] FCCU [46] RMWTA [47] TMLVTA [48] TMWTA [49] THCU [50] THCM [51] THLFA [52] TMUWTA [53] ATCCU [54] ATWTA [55] BWCU [56] BWWTA [57] ATMLFA [58] FCLMLFA [59] FCLLFA [60] FCWTA [61] FCWTA1 [62] FCULFA7 [63] FCULFA6 [64] FCULFA5 [65] FCULFA4 [66] FCULFA3 [67] FCULFA2 [68] FCULFA1 [69] FCUMLFA [70] FCCM [71] SMLFA [72] DVA [73] DVCM [74] TCVA [75] YVCM [76] AA -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes: Begin forwarded message: From: "Vogt, Tim (CONTR)" Date: April 1, 2014 10:47:39 AM MDT To: "Miller, Terry A" Subject: RE: ETCSZ fault with respect to geology Terry, Read the second thought first. First thought: There is a grid for each fault block. The fault is the seam where all of the fault blocks come together so there could be a step of some kind at the fault. The list below I believe is a list of the bordering fault blocks. (I might have an extra one because there is a different number north and south of the fault). In a perfect world one could go to the ‘horizon table’ information and find the polygons that are used for that grid for each fault block and thus blend all grids together. south of fault: above_EastGreeley_M_CH.2grd" above_ScrughamPeak_MN below_EastGreeley_M.2grd" below_RRSVM below_ScrughamPeak_MN below_ScrughamPeak_M north of fault: above_SCSZW_W above_SCSZW_MW above_ScrughamPeak_N below_ScrughamPeak_N above_Rickey Second thought: I’ve attached two files to this email that represent the top of the units needed. I wasn’t sure these files had been prepared until I just now looked. I think this may be easiest. In theory these two files are the output from the horizon table process. Try the second thought first. Tim Begin forwarded message: From: "Drellack, Sigmund" Date: April 1, 2014 8:04:08 AM MDT To: "Miller, Terry A" , "Vogt, Tim (CONTR)" Cc: "Coen, Kay L" , "Harp, Dylan R" , "Viswanathan, Hari S" , "Gable, Carl Walter" , "Kwicklis, Edward M" Subject: RE: ETCSZ fault with respect to geology Terry, Just to clarify: The top of the ETCSZ is the Base of the CHZCM. Smoothing makes sense. Sig Drellack National Security Technologies, LLC Contractor to the United States Department of Energy Mail Address Mail Stop NLV 082 P.O. Box 98521 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8521 Phone: 702-295-0170 FAX: 702-295-1313 E-mail: drellasl@nv.doe.gov From: Miller, Terry A [mailto:tamiller@lanl.gov] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 6:29 AM To: Vogt, Tim (CONTR); Drellack, Sigmund Cc: Coen, Kay L; Harp, Dylan R; Viswanathan, Hari S; Gable, Carl Walter; Kwicklis, Edward M Subject: Re: ETCSZ fault with respect to geology Thank you both. I will adjust the surface representing ETCSZ fault so that it has a smooth top set at a height equal to the CHZCM (Calico Hills) surface. I will send revised fault surface image when I am done. Terry On Mar 31, 2014, at 3:12 PM, Vogt, Tim (CONTR) wrote: Sig and Terry, Two informal images looking northish, along the entire length of the ETCSZ. The gray shows the ‘active fault’ area. The other is just so you can see the units more clearly. The top of the active fault does track the top of the CFCU (pink) reasonably closely. Sig – When queried the dip of the fault seems to be mostly between 88 and 89 degrees. if this does not fit your image of the way the top of the active area should be I’m sure it can be adjusted. Terry – if I can help you cut this along the top of the units or something let me know. Tim From: Drellack, Sigmund Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 2:04 PM To: Miller, Terry A; Vogt, Tim (CONTR) Cc: Harp, Dylan R Subject: RE: ETCSZ fault with respect to geology Terry, The ETCSZ is one of several caldera structural margins to the Silent Canyon caldera complex (SCCC). The SCCC is comprised of an older Grouse Canyon caldera and the younger Area 20 caldera. The W-E ETCSZ is the southern boundary for the Grouse Canyon Inner Collapse (collapse down on the north side) and the northern boundary for the Area 20 outer Collapse (down on the south side). As such we conceptualized this structure as being vertical. But, the model does not allow truly vertical structures, so in the HFM it is not perfectly vertical. The top of the ETCSZ should be the top of the Inlet Aquifer (IA) HSU on the south, and the top of the Crater Flat confining unit (CFCU) on the north. The top of the ETCSZ can also be defined as the base of the Calico Hills HSU(s) which overlies the IA and the CFCU. I hope this helps. Let me know if you have more questions. Sig Drellack National Security Technologies, LLC Contractor to the United States Department of Energy Mail Address Mail Stop NLV 082 P.O. Box 98521 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8521 Phone: 702-295-0170 FAX: 702-295-1313 E-mail: drellasl@nv.doe.gov Begin forwarded message: From: "Vogt, Tim (CONTR)" Date: March 19, 2014 10:17:03 AM MDT To: "Miller, Terry A" Cc: "Kwicklis, Edward M" , "Birdsell, Kay H" , "Harp, Dylan R" Subject: RE: faults for U20 grids Terry, The small fault crossing Buteo within the box you defined earlier is SPMSZ. You are correct in that there are many additional faults throughout this Phase II model. You are correct in that the faces files are good tools for viewing – slicing etc. When assigning grid nodes to an irregular – nonorthogonal surface there is an “ev_dist2surf” routine that calculates the distance of points to that surface. That might help you get to where you want to be. Thanks for the additional background. Tim From: Miller, Terry A [mailto:tamiller@lanl.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 6:42 AM To: Vogt, Tim (CONTR) Cc: Kwicklis, Edward M; Birdsell, Kay H; Harp, Dylan R Subject: Re: faults for U20 grids Thank you Tim, This helps very much. I will take a look at what you sent me via Kay when she has it. I am not very familiar with the .faces files, so be patient. They look handy for viewing. Looking at your images (below), I think I have ETCSZ clipped correctly. I think I have all the faults, except that small one crossing Buteo, can you tell me what that is? Is it RibCliff? It appears that faults in this area have changed quite a bit since our 2012 U20 models. Buteo did not exist in those and East Greeley was very short, stopping at ETCSZ. I am coloring uniform grids located around U-20WW. The colors represent HFM material zones and the intersection location of area faults. In these models, fault cells have properties different than HFM zone material cells. Ed Kwicklis and others were looking over my shoulder and are surprised at the added level of detail and changes in this area. I do not know what your time is like, but it would be nice to have a quick summary from your point of view of changes in this area. Here is the information I have from the 2012 model surfaces: --------------------------------- Files created and exported by Kevin Day 6/19/2012 Kevin.Day@nv.doe.gov Files are exported from chzcm_lavas.100x100x4.z10.unsliced.faces, an Earthvision model representing conceptualized distribution of lava flow aquifers within the Calico Hills Hydrostratigraphic Unit of the Pahute Mesa Phase I Hydrostratigraphic Framework Model. This export was produced within a polygon centered on well U20_WW, constrained on the top and bottom by the Calico Hills HSU and by UTM Zone 11 NAD 27 coordinates: X Y Minimum 548500 4119800 Maximum 554000 4125500 Range 5500 5700 Dimensions 111 115 Grid spacing 50 50 boxcar_wdcv2.dat / boxcar_wdcv2.tiploop.dat - Boxcar fault surface and tiploop polygon eastgreeley_wdcv2.dat / eastgreeley_wdcv2.tiploop.dat - East Greeley fault surface and tiploop polygon etcsz_wdc.dat / etcsz_wdc.tiploop.dat - East Thirsty Canyon Structural Zone fault surface and tiploop polygon ribcliffwdfull.dat / ribcliffwdfull.tiploop.dat- Ribbon Cliff Structural Zone fault surface and tiploop polygon westgreeley_wdc.dat / westgreeley_wdc.tiploop.dat - West Greeley fault surface and tiploop polygon --------------------------------- Terry On Mar 18, 2014, at 3:35 PM, Vogt, Tim (CONTR) wrote: Terry, The gold fault is Buteo. In a perfect geologic world it often makes sense that faults are truncated by other structures. In the modeling world these polygons are very important in defining the presentation of, and truncation of, and probably the calculation of offsets. I’ve enclosed an image that shows the details of this area. The grayish surface (mottled with purple) in the middle is the ‘active’ portion of the ETCSZ fault. Where that surface shows the colors of the fault blocks the fault is not ‘active’ or at least there is not offset across that surface. The image is created using the *.fb.unsliced.faces file. However the same effect can be created by using the regular faces file / coloring by fault block / and turning off some of the fault blocks. Hope this helps and don’t hesitate to ask if I can help. I’d prefer you were most efficient in getting what you need too. I know you are using tiploops etc . Are you creating a mesh and defining the regions affected by each fault and unit? Tim Begin forwarded message: From: "Vogt, Tim (CONTR)" Date: March 14, 2014 2:32:43 PM MDT To: "Miller, Terry A" Subject: RE: fault names Terry, Attached is a table with the correlations and acronyms. Let me know if you need more. Tim Begin forwarded message: From: "Drellack, Sigmund" Date: March 28, 2014 3:52:18 PM MDT To: "Miller, Terry A" Cc: "Vogt, Tim (CONTR)" Subject: RE: Groupings of EV zones to 2012 materials Terry, You have it right, the IA is separate and is below the Calico Hills group of HSUs. Keep in mind that CHLFA1 through 5 are lava flows (we handled them as property models) within the CHZCM/CHCU HSU (~matrix). If you have other HSU/HFM/geology questions, feel free to ask. Sig Drellack National Security Technologies, LLC Contractor to the United States Department of Energy Mail Address Mail Stop NLV 082 P.O. Box 98521 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8521 Phone: 702-295-0170 FAX: 702-295-1313 E-mail: drellasl@nv.doe.gov From: Vogt, Tim (CONTR) Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 9:09 AM To: Drellack, Sigmund Cc: Miller, Terry A Subject: FW: Groupings of EV zones to 2012 materials Sig I think this is a question to which you can best respond. Thanks for your help. Tim From: Miller, Terry A [mailto:tamiller@lanl.gov] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 7:39 AM To: Vogt, Tim (CONTR); Kwicklis, Edward M Cc: Birdsell, Kay H Subject: Groupings of EV zones to 2012 materials Hi Tim, I am working on correlation tables for 2014 HSU's to 2012 materials (1-8). See the attached table (page 1). These are my groupings based on what I see from the 2012 work. I am not sure if IA should be "below CH" or part of the CHZCM group. Let me know what you think. Forward this to anyone who should review. I will be adding more images with faults as I finish the meshes. Terry A. Miller LANL EES-16 505-667-8009 MESH Software https://lagrit.lanl.gov/ MESH Projects https://meshing.lanl.gov From: Terry Miller Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:19:57 -0700 To: Dylan Harp Subject: Re: Location of last years ugta mesh Hi Dylan, I do not see a mesh in this directory, but there are many subdirectories with subset meshes. Can you check your location of modeling runs and see what mesh files you used? Do you have a directory with mesh images anywhere? Thank you, Terry On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Harp, Dylan R wrote: /scratch/nts/gable/grid_gen/ascem/pahute_mesa/mesh/uniform Dylan Harp, EES-16, 505-667-5532 Terry A. Miller LANL EES-16 505-667-8009 MESH Software https://lagrit.lanl.gov/ MESH Projects https://meshing.lanl.gov Begin forwarded message: From: "Vogt, Tim (CONTR)" Date: March 24, 2014 2:29:08 PM MDT To: "Miller, Terry A" Cc: "Birdsell, Kay H (khb@lanl.gov)" Subject: updated sequence file Terry, Two items. This email includes an updated sequence file (same name). The sequence file should now label CHZCM rather than CHCU. To the best of my knowledge that is the only change in the sequence file. You should be able to substitute this new seq file in place of the previous one. I haven’t tried it yet. The Piute Mesa model has been changed very slightly in a portion of the area where it overlaps with the Rainier Mesa model. This should not affect your current area of interest but you should know this in case you need to work in the overlap area. If you have questions let me know. Tim Tim Vogt CPG Supporting Navarro-Intera, LLC contracted to the U.S. Department of Energy, NNSA Nevada Field Office 702-295-2057 office 702-994-2489 cell Tim.vogt@nv.doe.gov On Mar 7, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Vogt, Tim (CONTR) wrote: Terry, The HSU name was changed from ‘CHCU’ to ‘CHZCM’ very late in the game. It is likely that grids etc have not been renamed but that the stratigraphic sequence is renamed in the model making process. CHZCM is correct and all references to CHCU should be changed to CHZCM. It should be a direct correlation. When I run the faces dump routine I get identical results to you (except for the 77-unk and -1). What is the date of your faces file? If it predates something like the November 22 or 23 there may be a more recent one. Don’t hesitate if you have more questions. Tim Begin forwarded message: From: "Birdsell, Kay H" Date: March 6, 2014 3:10:27 PM MST To: "Miller, Terry A" , "Harp, Dylan R" Subject: RE: update on Pahute Mesa HFM Terry and Dylan, I downloaded this giant file as I was leaving work last night. It is now copied into \eescommon\Birdsell\UGTA\PM HFM_Mar 2014\20140305_for_LANL.tar Kay -- Kay H. Birdsell EES-16, MS T003 Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545 office: (505) 665-0260 cell: (505) 500-5224 From: Vogt, Tim (CONTR) [mailto:Tim.Vogt@nv.doe.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 2:25 PM To: Birdsell, Kay H; Miller, Terry A Cc: Ruskauff, Greg (CONTR); Day, Kevin (CONTR) Subject: RE: update on Pahute Mesa HFM Kay – Terry, The link below points to the tar file (1.4G). The tar file will NOT be the same as the eventual records package. The seq file makes reference to 15 files that are not included in this tar file. The 15 .3grd files are simply placeholders and are not used in the final result. If you need these I can provide them or a ‘dummy’ is easily created. https://ugta.nv.doe.gov/sites/EarthVision/VisualizationLibrary/20140305_for_LANL.tar If you have questions I or someone will address them. Tim Tim Vogt CPG Supporting Navarro-Intera, LLC contracted to the U.S. Department of Energy, NNSA Nevada Field Office 702-295-2057 office 702-994-2489 cell Tim.vogt@nv.doe.gov On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Birdsell, Kay H wrote: Hi All, While I was in Vegas last week, I had a pow-wow with Tim Vogt and Sig Drellack. They assured me that the Pahute Mesa HFM was ready to go and that it was simply a matter of tarring the files and sending them. I was able to talk Greg Ruskauf into blessing the file transfer. Greg sent me the link for the UGTA sharepoint site, and I’m downloading the files onto eescommon now. 399 MB – so it looks more promising than the previous link we got from Sig, which just had figures. Terry – Files are downloading now to: \eescommon\Birdsell\UGTA\PM HFM_Mar 2014\ovpmv25.lfas.zip Tim says you can call him with questions. Thanks for your patience everyone! Kay Terry A. Miller LANL EES-16 505-667-8009 MESH Software https://lagrit.lanl.gov/ MESH Projects https://meshing.lanl.gov